Evaluating the Sum of a Geometric Sequence

This is a short blog post that shows you an easy and intuitive way to derive the formula for the summation of an infinite geometric sequence. Let \( 0 \leq p < 1 \), and let \( a \) be some constant; then we wish to find the value of \( x \) such that $$ x = \sum_{k=0}^\infty a p^k $$ Writing out the first few terms of the summation, we get: $$ x = a + a p + a p^2 + a p^3 + \dots $$ Rewriting the equation by factoring out a \( p \) from every term except the first, we get: $$ x = a + p (a + a p + a p^2 + \dots) $$ Notice that the expression in parenthesis is exactly how \( x \) is defined. Replacing the expression with \( x \) leaves us with: $$ x = a + p x $$ Solving the equation for \( x \) yields $$ x = \frac{a}{1-p} $$ Just remember this simple derivation and you will never have to look up the formula for evaluating the sum of an infinite geometric sequence ever again!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Optimal Strategy for Farkle Dice

In this post, I will discuss my findings in terms of an optimal strategy for Farkle , which is a dice game of chance.  If you are unfamiliar with the game, I encourage you to skim the linked article so that you can better understand this blog post.  All of my findings are based on sound mathematical methods and a computer program was used to determine the optimal strategy.  Before I begin, let me first state the value of different dice rolls I assumed while developing the strategy. Each 1: 100 points Each 5: 50 points 3 1's: 1000 points 3 2's: 200 points ... 3 6's: 600 points 4 1's: 2000 points ... 4 6's 1200 points 5 1's 3000 points ... 5 6's 1800 points Straight 1-6 1500 points 3 Pairs (e.g., 22 33 44): 750 points Everything else is considered to be a Farkle (0 points). There are many variants to Farkle, but I like to play by this set of rules. The "game state" of Farkle roll can roughly be characterized by 2 values: the curre
Keep reading

Automatically Finding Recurrence Relations from Integer Sequences

In a lot of the recreational math and computer science problems I solve, I try to derive a recurrence relation that describes the situation. These recurrence relations pop up pretty often in counting problems (how many ways can you tile a 2xn grid with 2x1 tiles?) In some cases, I am unable to derive a recurrence relation directly from the problem statement, but still suspect that there exists some recurrence relation. In these cases, I end up solving the problem usin g brute force methods for small input sizes and analyzing/extrapolating the pattern. However, when the relation is obscure, it becomes hard to find. In order to make this process easier in the future, I created a program that can automatically find recurrence relations for arbitrary integer sequences. To use it, simply type in the first few terms of a sequence you are interested in, and it will try to find a recurrence relation for that sequence. There are some constraints on the allowable inputs/outputs which I di
Keep reading

Markov Chains and Expected Value

A few weeks ago, I was using a Markov Chain as a model for a Project Euler problem, and I learned about how to use the transition matrix to find the expected number of steps to reach a certain state. In this post, I will derive the linear system that will help answer that question, and will work out specific an example using a 1-dimensional random walk as the model. Terminology Before I begin the derivation, let me define some terms. The transition matrix is an \( n \) by \( n \) matrix that describes how you can move from one state to the next. The rows of the transition matrix must always sum to 1. States can either be transient or absorbing . An absorbing state is one that cannot be left once reached (it transitions to itself with probability 1). A transient state is a state that is not an absorbing state. In many problems, it is of general interest to compute the expected number of steps to reach an absorbing state (from some start state). Derivation  Let \( p_
Keep reading